Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Rudolf Molleker vs David Pichler Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Molleker vs Pichler analysis and find out who is favored!
Rudolf Molleker vs David Pichler Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Molleker 2 - 0 Pichler
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Molleker has won 53.72% of points on their second serve, while Pichler has won 49.9%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Molleker, in recent form, has won 50.14% of their opponent's second serve points, while Pichler has won 54.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.46% and 30.41% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Molleker has saved 60.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pichler has saved 58.02% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Molleker has won 56% of matches played (W/L 42/ 33), with Pichler winning 47.54% (W/L 29/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Molleker has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 160/ 112), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 14% (W/L 1/ 6). Pichler has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 121/ 82), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Molleker has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 39/ 26), where as Pichler has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.63% of matches (W/L 20/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Molleker winning 2 times and Pichler being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Molleker winning 4 and Pichler winning 0. The last match between Molleker and Pichler was at the M15 Kamen, 26-06-2022, Final, Clay with Rudolf Molleker getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:13:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Molleker and Pichler have played a deciding set 0 times, with Molleker winning 0 times and Pichler 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Molleker winning 0, and Pichler 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Molleker has played against opponents with an average rank of 289.15 while Pichler has played against players with an average rank of 190.41.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Molleker has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pichler has won 30% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Molleker has converted 43.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pichler has converted 44.62% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
163
Rank
146
High
23
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
587
Rank
390
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
54% (220-188)
Career Total W/L
56% (342-267)
53% (16-14)
YTD W/L
43% (9-12)
$290,500
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Rudolf Molleker | David Pichler |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 25 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 13 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:13:30 | 1:13:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (68/101) | 66% (76/116) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (53/68) | 61% (46/76) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 67% (22/33) | 50% (20/40) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (7/21) | 67% (2/3) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (50/116) | 26% (26/101) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Rudolf Molleker
Player
David Pichler
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
David Pichler
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
9
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
12 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Rudolf Molleker | David Pichler |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (16/14) | 43% (9/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (38/28) | 52% (25/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (313/299) | 51% (221/213) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 50% (4/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 38% (5/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.75 | 0.3 |
| Aces Total | 226 | 64 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 81 | 59 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:1 | 1:41:53 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 306.03 | 260.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1152/1891) | 63% (871/1388) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (846/1152) | 68% (592/871) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (397/739) | 50% (258/517) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (63/144) | 45% (58/130) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (674/1883) | 40% (559/1402) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (13/10) | 42% (5/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (16/29) | 47% (9/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 70% (7/10) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 14% (1/7) | 25% (2/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (20/16) | 82% (11/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (20/4) | 18% (11/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (10/0) | 10% (10/1) |
Rudolf Molleker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Rudolf Molleker
48%
(
43 of
89)
1st Serve %
52%
(
45 of
86)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
5
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Molcan
Player
Rudolf Molleker
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
45%
(
28 of
62)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Jaime Faria
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
44%
(
27 of
62)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
79%
(
42 of
53)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Rudolf Molleker
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Francesco Passaro
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
9
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Rudolf Molleker
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
50%
(
52 of
105)
6
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
105
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(1) 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Nick Hardt
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Rudolf Molleker
75%
(
77 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
49 of
65)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
29 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(5) 0-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Viktor Durasovic
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
David Pichler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Sorger
Player
David Pichler
90%
(
9 of
10)
1st Serve %
54%
(
14 of
26)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
56%
(
5 of
9)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
0%
(
0 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
16
Total Points Won
20
|
2-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
David Pichler
50%
(
36 of
72)
1st Serve %
43%
(
21 of
49)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Daniel Michalski
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pietro Marino
Player
David Pichler
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Gabriele Vulpitta
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
David Pichler
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
David Pichler
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
11
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
88
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
David Pichler
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Christian Langmo
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Molleker Vs Pichler Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
